Gender-based violence
Translation generated by AI. Access the original version
Life imprisonment with possibility of parole for double crime
The Supreme Court (SC) has fully upheld the conviction of a man for the murder of his former partner and their daughter , an 11-month-old baby, in a case described as particularly serious due to its connection with a context of gender-based violence .
According to the proven facts, the convicted individual had previous convictions for breaching restraining orders and was subject to a restraining order . Nevertheless, he returned to the family home and resumed living together with his former partner and the child, despite the judicial prohibition. At one point, the Civil Guard requested him to leave the residence . It was then when, taking advantage of the woman and the child entering the house, he surprised them with an attack of extreme violence, leaving them with no real chance of defense. The account includes repeated blows, the use of a bladed weapon against the mother, and the suffocation of the child, resulting in the death of both.
The Supreme Court emphasizes that the crime against the former partner is framed within gender-based violence and that the murder of the daughter also occurs in that context, highlighting the so-called "vicarious" gender-based violence, that is, the harm to the minor to increase the mother's suffering. It also shows a framework of domination and control, combined with repeated breach of precautionary measures. The Supreme Court endorses the conviction of the High Court for two counts of murder (with aggravating factors of kinship and discrimination based on gender) and for a continued offense of breach of precautionary measure with aggravating factor of relapse, rejecting the appeal because the evidence was assessed in a rational, motivated, and sufficient manner. In situations arising from episodes related to gender-based violence, our professionals make themselves available to provide the necessary assistance and advice. increase suffering of the mother. There is also evidence of a domination and control , coupled with repeated breach of precautionary measures.
The SCJ endorses the conviction of the Superior Court of Justice for two counts of murder (with aggravating factors of kinship and gender discrimination) and for a continued offense of breach of precautionary measure with aggravating circumstances of relapse, rejecting the appeal because the evidence was assessed in a rational, motivated, and sufficient manner.
In situations arising from episodes related to gender-based violence, our professionals are available to provide the necessary assistance and advice-
Misappropriation
Instrumental transmission of social shares to operate bank accounts
-
Crimes of misappropriation and fraud
Misappropriation of amounts delivered to complete a housing promotion The case revolves around a real estate promotion in Riogordo (Málaga), consisting of 20 homes, managed by a promoting company. In the first stage, two people were listed as joint administrators (although one of them handled the daily management). Between 2008 and 2009, several homes were sold and buyers delivered amounts on account. Some were even given the keys, despite the fact that the work was not actually finished (it was said to be 90% complete), no deed was granted, and the construction company ended up abandoning due to non-payments. The result was that buyers found themselves living in houses without deeds and without a clear situation in the Registry. Some time later, those administrators sold their shares and a third person entered as the sole administrator. This new administrator was aware of the previous problem, but still asked some buyers for additional money (for example, 8,000 euros) on the argument that it was to complete the promotion. The relevant point is that this money was not used for what was promised nor was it returned. Furthermore, between 2010 and 2011, new sales of homes occurred under similar conditions, and later the entire set of 20 homes was sold to another company, generating a serious conflict between those who had bought earlier and those who appeared later as titleholders. The Provincial Court acquitted the first two administrators (it was not proven that they had diverted the money), but convicted the last one for aggravated misappropriation and fraud. The Supreme Court (TS) confirmed the conviction and rejected the appeal as it did not accept reopening the evaluation of the evidence and considered the denial of new documentation correct because it referred to subsequent facts and was not relevant to what was judged.
-
Union law
The CJEU supports the Amnesty Law for normalizing the situation in Catalonia
This website uses both its own and third-party cookies to analyze our services and navigation on our website in order to improve its contents (analytical purposes: measure visits and sources of web traffic). The legal basis is the consent of the user, except in the case of basic cookies, which are essential to navigate this website.